Copy of old e-Citation page

Prerequisites to e-citation implementation

The court must sign a contract for a required paid service on their CMS.  No certification testing can take place until this has happened.

Required data format

e_citation_service_producer.xsd  - the XML schema for providing electronic citation data from a single traffic stop/incident.

e_citation_service_producer.html - a human-readable version of the same thing

Certification testing

Each e-Citation vendor that is new to Goodin must successfully complete an overall, initial certification test to ensure the compatibility of their data with our systems, and must conduct an individual certification for every county that wants to adopt e-Citation before they go live, at the time they are ready to proceed.

Required agency/officer testing code values for initial certification

Use the following values for resting (or let us know if if this isn't possible):

• • Court ORI: IL016025J (Cook County). It isn't absolutely necessary to set this, since our e-Citation ticket import presumes that the e-Citation vendor didn't provide the wrong court's data.

• Agency ORI: IL0250200 (Effingham ) - changed this code on 01/03/2023 to an agency that is present in our records

• Officer badge number/name:

  • Badge Number: 822

  • Officer Name: KUHNS, PAUL

  • Agency ORI: IL0250000

    • Changed this on 04/26/2023 to an officer that is present in our records

    • Some test scenario tickets can use other badge numbers and names, but please check with us first, as failing to use the correct data (or using data that isn't in our systems) can cause errors when we go to process the e-Citation in our test environment (the same is true for users in the real world)

• Hearing courtroom (<Event>/Location) - if the court expects the officer to indicate this, it has be a courtroom number which exists in our development server (if used, it should be Courtroom A)

• TownshipCode/TownshipName: 51/Panama TWP - changed this on 02/15/2024 to a township that is present in our records (NOTE: Panama was somehow deleted out of our test environment and had to be added back. As such, the vendor should reconfirm with us what the appropriate township code for Panama is before proceeding, since it isn't uncommon for other users to change this data around in the test environment without informing us first)

Required violator/litigant testing code values for initial certification

Use the following litigant for all citations except the CA/MX test (Test #4):

• John Q. Smith

• 999 West 9th Street, Centralia, Illinois, 62801 (no periods or commas in address)

• DOB: 01/01/1978

• DL Number: S53047578001

• DL State: IL

For Test #4, use the following, respectively:

• Canada:

  • • John R. Smythe

    • 465 Victoria Street, Kamloops, BC, V2C 2A9, Canada (no periods or commas in address)

    • DOB: 01/01/1978

    • DL Number: 1234567

• Mexico:

• • Juan S. Herrera

    • Perif Carlos Pellicer Cámara 511, Guayabal, 86080 Villahermosa, Tab, Mexico (no periods or commas in address)

    • DOB: 01/01/1978

    • DL Number: H1234

Test scenarios

BEFORE TESTING! Judici staff processing the test files shall verify that the client has signed a proposal for e-Citation services.

The e-Citation vendor should create the following test citations,  while configured using the testing code values referenced above.  All test data should include the citation PDFs in-line as per the above-referenced schema. 

Revised 02/15/2024

A single test ticket should represent only one scenario

NOTE 1: The e-citation vendor has the option when submitting their tests to affirm that one or more tests aren't even possible with their system or in the given county being tested.

• 1. Multiple offenses on the same incident.

     • One with two TR charges (Expected results: Pre-2022- JIMS will split-out the two charges onto separate cases. Post-2022- a single TR case.)

     • Added 11/8/2021: First offense entered in e-citation system is an MT charge and the second is a TR charge.  GAL must test with our 2022 version.  (Expected results: Pre-2022-  N/A.  Post-2022- A single case (type MT) having both charges)

       1. One possible MT offense: Offense 19382    DL EXPIRED MORE THAN A YEAR   625 ILCS 5 6-101

     • Added 11/8/2021: First offense entered is a TR charge and second is an MT charge .  GAL must test with our 2022 version.  (Expected results: Pre-2022-  N/A.  Post-2022- A single case (type MT) having both charges)

  2. If the court is accepting e-citations with CM offenses

     • Single CM offense- expected results: A single case (type CM)

     • First count CM and second TR charge (Expected results: Pre-2022-  two separate cases (a CM and a TR). Post-2022- A single case (type CM) having both charges)

     • First count CM, second MT charge, and third TR (Expected result: A single case (type CM) having all three charges in the order or severity (CM, MT, TR)

     • Added 05/24/2023- First count MT, second CM, and third TR (Expected result: A single case (type CM) having all three charges in the order or severity (CM, MT, TR)

     • Added 05/24/2023- First count TR, second CM, and third TR (Expected result: A single case (type CM) having all three charges in the order or severity (CM, TR, TR)

  3. Modified 12/17/2021: Major traffic test: Use offense code 19458 - Speeding 35+ MPH Over Limit , 625 ILCS 5/11-601.5(b) (Expected results: Pre-2022, N/A. Post-2022: An MT case having both charges)

  4. Added 12/17/2021: One QC may-appear offense and one TR may-appear (Expected results: Pre-2022, N/A. Post-2022: A TR case having both charges)

  5. DUI- this should use both "flavors" of DUI offense typically charged (offense codes 14721 and 14722). (Expected results: JIMS will put both charges on the same DT case)

  6. Local ordinance violations:

• • 1. Statutory/ILCS violations with an AOIC offense code.  Technically, these aren't supposed to be written as ordinance violations, but it still happens occasionally (e.g. underage consumption, minor cannabis possession, dog running at large). Expected results: The XML <Offense>Type should (per the specs) always contains the Case Type assigned to that offense in the AOIC offense table (e.g. TR, MT, CM etc). As such, the CMS should make a case of that type (see Note 1 above)

    2. Non-ILCS violations such as for weed abatement.  Confirm that the provider will always sends <Charge>Code="0000000" when there is no offense code (Expected results: The XML <Offense>Type for local ordinance violations not in the offense table should always be OV, resulting in the CMS creating an OV case and importing the submitted ordinance violation charge description into the Edit Charges screen. NOTE: If you get an RTE when processing the OV in the Inbox, it is almost always because the XML is missing the Charge Code of "0000000". Ask digiTICKET to fix this.)

• 7. A test of both combined into a single citation (Expected results: A TR or MT case, with a count having the submitted local ordinance violation charge description on it)

• • 1. Note for testing FB19906- if the Inbox manages to do this test correctly, see if a user can MANUALLY create such as case

    2. NOTE: Added 11/05/2021

• 8. Foreign (Canadian or Mexican) DL, foreign plates and foreign address (Expected results: JIMS will import the foreign address, including the state/province and country)

  9. DELETED

  10. Different bond types

      • Non-cash (Pre-SAFE-T Act: Expected results: The bond type chosen will appear in the Edit Case screen (under the Case tab) in the "Bond type" drop-down menu; Post-SAFE-T Act: Bond is no longer a thing in Illinois, so this should simply be set to CashBondType="None" and NonCashBondType="None")

      • Cash (needs <Payment> element (Expected results: The bond type chosen will appear as "Cash" in the Edit Case screen (under the Case tab in the "Bond type" drop-down menu) with the amount paid appearing in the "Cash bond set" field, and you will be prompted to receipt the payment upon saving the case) No longer permitted under the SAFE-T Act

  11. Both (needs <Payment> element.  This test dropped per Kayte 8/24/2021: DUIs were the only situation in which both a cash and non-cash bond would've been possible.  The bond type called "DUI Bond" was probably added expressly to allow systems to indicate two bond types at once.  So there is no reason for this test.

  12. Do one ticket for a driver with a commercial DL, driving a commercial vehicle and carry hazardous materials. This will use the HazardousMaterialsFlag, DriverPassenger and CommercialVehicleFlag elelments (see http://www.goodinassociates.com/schema/Drafts/e_citation_service_producer.html#BMVInfo for more on these elements and their values). (Expected results: The "Commercial driver license", "Commercial vehicle", and "HazMat vehicle" checkboxes in the Vehicles tab will all be checked)

  13. Violator having ALL of the possible identity info in http://www.goodinassociates.com/schema/Drafts/e_citation_service_producer.html#Identity (Expected results: All of the above-mentioned identity information will appear under the "Litigant" tab in the appropriate field for each. NOTE: All height measurements come in from digiTICKET as inches, and JIMS converts them to feet/inches measurement.)

  14. One test using several items in the schema which have a required list of values (those having an "enumeration"): 

      • Man, with hazel-colored eyes and no hair at all

      • Incident took place in an urban district . 

      • Use offense code 17614 Speeding 35+ MPH Over Limit , 625 ILCS 5/11-601.5(b), to see if the e-citaion XML has <LitigantDetails>AppearanceCode="MUSTAPPEAR"

      • The passenger was injured (PersonalInjury)

      • Driver is required to appear in court (AppearanceCode) (Expected results: The eye color appears as such, and the "hair color" comes in as "bald". Items 2 through 4 appear within the Edit Charge screen, with the checkboxes for "Urban" and "Must-Appear" checked, and the dropdown menu for "Injury/Death" reflecting an injury ("Injury"))

  15. A ticket on a township road - as per clarification received from AOIC on 11/4/2016, the township name is  is to be provided whenever the officer sets the township road indicator to reflect that the township maintains the road on which the ticket was issued. (Expected results: The "Pay-to Agency" in the Edit Case screen is changed to the township in question (in this case Panama, which as of February 2024 should be using an TownshipCode of 51, subject to change))

  16. NO LONGER REQUIRED (since ADR doesn't require it)) A ticket involving a passenger (if e-citation system supports that)

  17. NO LONGER REQUIRED ( case is modified as required):  Attempt to create lower-case data where allowed by the e-citation vendor's user interface, on any field containing text (e.g. FullName and AddressLine).  Added 7/19/2016

  18. Create a warning ticket for a litigant named "WARREN, INGE", to make sure that it is not sent to the court.  Added 12/16/2016 (see Note 1 above)

Issues which the e-citation vendor shall affirm during testing that they comply with specs (available here), since these really can't be tested:

• A ticket with no plate state (should have PlateState="")

• Not pre-applying a court Clerk file stamp.  Added 1/15/2021 after an issue in Marion County.

• Officer badge number data type and max length.   Added 1/22/2021 after an issue in Clay County. As of 1/22/2021, this means numeric with a max length of five.

• Ticket number data type and max length.   As of 1/22/2021, this is alpha-numeric with a max of 12 chars.

• Plate number- as of 1/22/2021, this is alpha-numeric with a max of 9 chars.

PLEASE NOTE: Officer names cannot have periods in them; otherwise, our system will error-out.

Court configuration review prior to go-live

Key code values

Permalink

The e-citation vendor should work with the court to configure their systems to match up with key data in the court's CMS:

• • Court NCIC/ORI code is available in PC JIMS, but there's an easier way to get it.  Pick the county from the list at http://www.judici.com/courts/court_list.jsp, then observe the value of the "court" parameter on the resulting URL

  • Agency NCIC/ORI codes are in the court agency table in JIMS

  • Charge code- e-citation shall use the standard statewide codes found in the AOIC offense table.  In some counties, certain offenses eligible to be written on a uniform complaint (DUIs?) are supposed to go to the State's Attorney rather than getting imported right into PC JIMS. The e-citation vendor is responsible for excluding these from the data for import.

  • Officer badge number/name- check them against the arresting officers set up in PC JIMS.

  • Warning: CMS requires "Lastname, Firstname" format.  Our e-citation importer makes new officers "on the fly" if they aren't in JIMS.  And because badge numbers get re-used, we add any officer whose badge number and name don't match JIMS exactly.  So failure to match both will result in duplicate officer records.  The same thing will occur if you provide the wrong agency NCIC code for an officer.

  • Hearing courtroom and hearing type (which can show up in the <Event> element in the ticket data)-  if the court wants to use a consistent courtroom for all the hearings, the e-citation vendor will need to know this.  Many court's use a hearing type "20" (First Appearance)

  • Township names and codes- per a conversation with AOIC staff on 11/4/2016,  the township road checkbox is to be checked by the officer whenever the road is maintained by the township.  This causes JIMS to set the township as the Pay To agency so that they get money from the ticket.  Since any given township might handle maintenance, or start to do so at any given time, the e-citation system should be set up with a list of all townships in the county, and officers will have to be trained on when to check off the Township Road box on the ticket based on who is maintaining the road at the time.  To determine the code values the e-citation vendor needs to provide township data to the court:

    • Open the Edit Arresting Agencies screen (under the Technical|Case Management Tables menu)

    • Use the value in the Code column for each township.

Other court configuration

What tools are required to get the data to the court? This depend on which e-citation vendor you use.  The follow vendors are certified for e-citation submission:

• • DigiTicket-   they provide a program which gets the data

  • APS- GAL installs a program on your GAL PC which uses web services provided by DuPage County to regularly check for new data.

Where should a vendor-provided tools such as DigiTicket's be installed?

It's the court's choice what PC should run a program which gets the data.

Where incoming e-citation data is to be put?

It should go in the same location where the court keeps its Imaging files (since that is reliably available). Where is this?

• • The IP address can be found at http://countyname-judici.clients:8080/gal-nas

  • The share folder is usually \Imaging

For example: \\192.168.1.235\Imaging 

How do the e-citations get from that folder into the CMS Inbox?

GAL moves it in about once a minute, so the XML e-citation data doesn't stay on the Imaging share for long.

How does the e-citation vendor get data to the court? 

The new submission XML files need to get to the above-referenced location somehow.  Possible options:

1. Preferred option- vendor provides to court a tool which (automatically or by user interaction) pulls them down.  

   1. Note for court staff- the e-citation vendor may require a mapped drive in order to access this.  If the vendor's tool is being installed on a PC which also runs Imaging, there is a good chance that the PC already has an "I:" drive mapped this address/folder.  If you need help setting up a mapped drive, call us.

2. Judici writes a simple script to pull them down.