at JKB article ID:6000 (permalink) Revised: 9/23/2020
Disclaimer: We are not attorneys and cannot give legal advice, but the following is our understanding of the issues surrounding online document access.
A May 30 2017 order (see here) initially called for re:SearchIL.
Note especially that the prohibition on showing Confidential Records, even to Attorneys of Record, as per para. 3e on p. 6.
Also note that he RAP doesn't apply to CMS users such as judges, SAs, PDs and POs, which the Clerk can configure to have more access than other online users such as private attorneys.
GAL note: Highlighting reflects testing logged here.
WHAT
|
| Case types/subtypes or filing codes not in AOIC standards
(as per | Confidential Records the stuff secured at the court)
| Non-Public Documents | Avail. to all user groups (the public case types) | Notes
| | | Case types/subtypes or Filing Codes
| Any not in standards
| AD, J, JA, JD, MH and other items restricted under the RKM) | CC,CF,CH,CL,CM,CV,D,DT,
F,MR,OP,OV,P,SC,TR | AR, ED, L, LM, MC, TX | | | | Case "metadata" (case #/title, party name, atty) | Not shown | Not shown
| Shown | Shown | | | | Document index/title
| Not shown | Not shown
| Shown | Shown | | | | Documents | Not shown | Not shown
| Not shown | Shown | | | |
| | | | | | | WHO |
| | | | | | User Group
|
| | | | | | | 3 | Public- ACCESS NOT YET IMPLEMENTED, even though it is allowed under the RAP
| No | No
| No | No* | * Per this order: RAP permits such access, but it has been delayed pending the successful testing conducted by User Group 5 (see below).
| | 5 | Licensed attorneys (not the attorney of record)- implemented at Judici, but not yet at re:SearchIL
| No
| No
| Yes (doc. index only)
| Yes (Judici-only)**
(docs filed after 1/1/2020 only).
As of Sep. 2020, this was only available on Judici**
| ** The first round of testing this in re:SearchIL, in late-summer 2020, led AOIC staff to recommend delaying further access on re:SearchIL
| | 2 | Attorneys of Record | No
| No | Yes
(docs filed after 7/1/2018 only)
| Yes
(docs filed after 7/1/2018 only)
| | | 1 | Judges | No
| Only on Judici
| Yes (only Judici has docs filed before 7/1/2018)
| Yes (only Judici has docs filed before 7/1/2018)
|
| | 4 | Clerk staff
| No
| Only on Judici | Yes (only Judici has docs filed before 7/1/2018) | Yes (only Judici has docs filed before 7/1/2018) |
| | | | | | | | | CMS users
| The RAP doesn't apply to CMS users. So Clerks can configure Judici as they see fit for CMS users.
| | | | | | | | Automatic security groups
| | | | | | | | - Judges
| | | | | |
| - SAs/ASAs
| | As directed by Clerk
| As directed by Clerk | Yes (incl, pre-1/1/2020 docs if desired)
| | | | - PDs | | "
| " | " | | | | - POs using PC JIMS Probation module
| | "
| " | " | | | | Extended Access groups- Clerk manually assigns users their own custom groups. For example:
| |
|
|
| | | | - Juvenile POs
| | As directed by Clerk | As directed by Clerk | As directed by Clerk | | | | - Judges seeing open warrants
| | " | "
| " | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
